Return of ‘The Rose’

January 11, 2013 § Leave a comment

Jay DeFeo working on The Rose at 2322 Fillmore. Photograph © 2012 Burt Glinn Magnum Photos

ART HISTORY | JEROME TARSHIS

Youthful aspiration, ambivalence toward conventional art world success and a pitifully low budget came together for artists Bruce Conner and Jay DeFeo in the history of her masterpiece, “The Rose,” now on view at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art through February 3.

DeFeo worked on the painting for eight years in her apartment at 2322 Fillmore Street, a four-unit apartment house between Clay and Washington. The building — still standing — was home to a small pantheon of artistic San Franciscans. In addition to poet Michael McClure and his wife, Joanna, its tenants included at various times the artist-couples William and Joan Brown, Sonia Gechtoff and James Kelly, and Jay DeFeo and Wally Hedrick.

DeFeo and Hedrick gave outstanding parties — they seemed to exemplify living everyday life as a work of art — and their studio became a popular destination for visiting writers, artists, collectors and curators.

For much of the time they lived on Fillmore, DeFeo was working on “The Rose,” building up layer upon layer of paint to a thickness of eight inches. By the time she stopped working on it, in 1965, it weighed a ton and its future was compromised by the fact that its paint was so heavy that the painting was pulling itself apart.

Bruce Conner, who lived nearby at 2365 Jackson Street, said that DeFeo’s potentially endless reworking of “The Rose” needed “an uncontrolled event to make it stop.” The Pasadena Art Museum had asked to exhibit the painting, but DeFeo put off letting it go. The eviction of Hedrick and DeFeo from 2322 Fillmore provided the nudge; it was necessary to move “The Rose” somewhere, and circumstances dictated Pasadena.

On November 9, 1965, a crew from Bekins Van and Storage removed “The Rose” through an opening sawed into the front wall of DeFeo’s studio and lowered it to a flatbed truck. That was not the end of what came to seem an obsessive effort; DeFeo worked on the painting for three more months in Pasadena before curator Walter Hopps could persuade her that she had done enough.

Conner filmed the painting’s departure from Fillmore Street, exposing 700 feet of film over a period of two days. In 1967 he released the seven-minute final version, with a sound track from Miles Davis’s Sketches of Spain. Its title was The White Rose: Jay DeFeo’s Painting Removed by Angelic Hosts. In their white coveralls the movers seemed to radiate light, much as the painting itself seemed to do.

Conner’s involvement did not stop with the film. Although the painting was an art world legend, and in 1959 any of a number of American museums would have loved to acquire it, by 1967 both DeFeo and “The Rose” had fallen off the radar.

Conner appointed himself DeFeo’s “manager” and over a period of more than 20 years participated, with other DeFeo admirers, in an often frustrating effort to find a museum that would acquire the painting and pay for the needed restoration. Until that happened, “The Rose” remained entombed in plaster behind a wall at the San Francisco Art Institute. DeFeo died in 1989, at the age of 60, her death arguably hastened by the unremitting work, heavy drinking and intense exposure to paint fumes that went into the creation of “The Rose.”

In 1995 the Whitney Museum of American Art in New York signed an agreement to acquire the painting if it could be successfully stabilized. The following year “The Rose” was exhibited for the first time since 1969. It has since taken its place as a viewable artwork rather than a hidden-away object of legend.

Thomas Hoving, former director of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, included “The Rose” in his book Greatest Works of Art of Western Civilization. He describes it as “perhaps the single most expressive painting of the 1960s.”

During the many years “The Rose” lay hidden from view, Conner’s beautiful, elegiac film was the only form in which this masterpiece of American painting could be seen by the public. It remains a tribute to the friendship between two artists — and to a time when Fillmore Street was a center of avant-garde creativity.

Read more: “Renaissance on Fillmore, 1955-1965

The Rose being removed from 2322 Fillmore in 1965.

The Rose being removed from 2322 Fillmore in 1965.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading Return of ‘The Rose’ at Art Matters.

meta

%d bloggers like this: